The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.
This website is using Matomo Analytics. If you do not want the owner of this website to aggregate and analyze the actions you take here, you can prevent it by opting out on the "Impressum & Data Protection Policy" page. Doing so will protect your privacy, but will also prevent the owner from learning from your actions and creating a better experience for you and other users.
This blog is following the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) of the EU. It values your privacy and the protection of your data.
Close
I liked the article and agree with all of your points, thank you for sharing this! I only have one note: calling women “females” is something you do a few times in this article, and each time it gave me an unpleasant feeling, since most people who use this word are either sexist men or trans exclusive so-called feminists, who both use the argument of “biology” to sort people into two categories… Animals can be called female, but for human beings, I haven’t seen it used in progressive contexts.
Thank you for your constructive comment and for bringing this to my attention, Ana! I wasn’t aware of this before but I’ll keep it in mind for future texts.